Skip to main content

Effect of Anti-profiteering Measure in GST


The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is coming into existence w.e.f. 1st of July 2017.

On some items, there is a reduction in the rate of tax. This reduction in GST rate from the earlier rate reduces the price of the goods or services. The benefit of this reduction in rate and the consequent reduction in price should be passed on to by the seller of the goods or services to the buyer of the goods or services.

In the GST there is a provision for the benefit of the Input Tax Credit. This benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) must also be passed on by the seller of the goods or services to the buyer of the goods or services by a commensurate reduction in the prices of the goods or services.

In order to pass on this benefit, the GST law provides for an Anti-profiteering clause (Section 171 of GST) as a deterrence measure.

In view of the above, it is in the interest of the seller to pass on this benefit to the buyer, and it is also in the interest of the buyer to ask this benefit rightfully from the seller.

The Finance Minister, Mr. Arun Jaitley, has expressed the hope that the government will not have to use the anti-profiteering provision of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), the same shall act as a deterrence, and the prices should drop overall under the new regime, which is to come into existence w.e.f. 1st July 2017.
Labels:
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

State rules can’t be in violation of RERA provisions, says the Central Government !!

The following news appeared in the Times of India, Pune edition of 22nd May 2017. The Central Government has again clarified that the States can not dilute the essence of the RERA provisions. It is a settled law that subordinate legislation such as rules, regulations, schemes etc. cannot be in violation of the provisions of the principal Act and any such provision inserted in the rules will be open to legal challenge and liable to be struck down by the courts, Minister of State for Housing, Rao Inderjit Singh said in a letter to Haryana chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar. Opinion: It has been in the news that many states are trying to dilute the RERA provisions by promulgating weak state rules which are inconsistent with the Central RERA legislation. This will result in an unnecessary litigation and go against the very objective of bringing RERA. The states are obliged to promulgate rules that are consistent with the central legislation and they should refrain from diluting th
Post a Comment
Read more

RERA Authorities in India

Under Section 20(1) of the Real Estate Regulation Act 2016, the Appropriate Government will have to establish the Real Estate Regulatory Authority. Following is the status of all the Real Estate Regulatory Authorities of the States and the Union Territories:
Post a Comment
Read more

Haryana Government dilutes the Draft RERA Rules. Please sign the petition to protest !!

The Haryana Government has promulgated the Draft RERA Rules on 28th April 2017 and has given just 15 days to seek Objections or Suggestions from the public. The people of Haryana feel cheated as the Rules are diluted and are not consistent with the Central Act. The Real Estate Regulation Act 2016 does not empower the State Governments to dilute the Rules. Please sign the petition to protest and impact your opinion !! CM Haryana: Implement #RERA in Haryana immediately covering existing undelivered ... https://t.co/mE5F4jyWMg via @ChangeOrg_India — Avadhoot Dandekar (@Webtwits) May 23, 2017
Post a Comment
Read more